data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7c68/d7c6869b28b25f78097ca0c62f0023574cbb85cc" alt=""
+
Hmm. A friend of mine this weekend opened my eyes to something rather thought provoking! I was (of course) talking about saving the earth, going green, etc. and he said to me "You know, it really has nothing to do with saving the planet. I mean, more than likely, the planet will bounce back. We might take it to the brink, but when mankind is gone, it'll come back, and take over once more. What we're really talking about when we say saving the planet is saving mankind from extinction, because we'll have made the planet uninhabitable. That's what we're really trying to save here."
A very interesting point of view, don't you think? I mean, yeah, we know the reasons we do what we do is to make the planet a better place for man and animal; but I wonder if it'd have more or less impact if we started using "Save Mankind" instead of "Save The Planet." Would we get the same results (which as far as my jadedness is concerned, is fleeting disinterest from most people?) Curious...
1 comment:
That's funny, because I was just thinking about how the issue is that we have consumed way more resources than we have available, and eventually, we'll run out of resources as a species and no longer be able to sustain ourselves. The way we treat this planet is very selfish, and eventually, we'll run out.
And I always say no to plastic bags. Especially when I go to Target or anywhere and just pick up a few things and carry it to the register. If I can carry it around the store, I can surely carry it out of the store. It should just be a rule that you don't automatically give someone a bag when they have one or two things. I'm sure that would save a lot of plastic bags too. I don't eat at Subway, so I never realized that they do that, so they shouldn't have plastic bags.
Post a Comment